A new study suggests that gay men
generally have “significantly fewer” sexual partners than they did 10 years
ago.
Comparing data from National Surveys
of Family Growth in 2002 and between 2006-10, the study shows a consistent decline in sexual
partners across most ethnicities and age groups, particularly men under the age
of 24.
Condom use, or rather, the sad lack
thereof, remains unchanged.
Key findings include:
* Between 2002 and 2010, the mean
number of sexual partners among men who have sex with men (MSM) fell from 2.9
to 2.3
* Among men under 24, 2.9 to 2.1;
among men 35-44, 3.0 to 2.2
* Among men with incomes under 150%
of the US federal poverty level, 3.0 to 2.1
* Among men living in suburban
metropolitan areas, 3.2 to 2.1; the number of sexual partners remained the same
among men in city-center areas, 2.6
* Among white men, 3.0 to 2.5; among
black men, 2.4 to 1.9
* In 2002, 57% of men had not used a
condom the last time they had sex, compared to 58% in 2006-10
* Among MSM who also have sex with
women, 46% had not used a condom the last time they had vaginal sex in
2002, compared to 67% by 2010
* MSM who had had female
partners also decreased from 38% to 25%
* Fewer men reported transactional
sex (sex for money or drugs), down from 15% to 3%
* Fewer men said they had injected
drugs or had had sex with someone who had injected drugs, down from 12% to 5%
* In 2002 and 2006-10, 41% of men
said they had had an HIV test in the last year; 38% reported having an STI
check-up in 2002 and 39% in 2006-10.
* The proportion of men who had never had
an HIV test fell from 25 to 15%.
Researchers claim “gay men appear to
have taken steps that could reduce their HIV risk by using a method that has
received little emphasis in HIV prevention programmes for gay men – reducing
their number of partners – while not increasing condom use, which has received
the most emphasis.”
However, HIV prevalence and the
incidence of STIs increased in gay men despite the decrease in numbers of
partners and other sexual risk behaviors indicate the influence of “network
factors,” particularly among young black gay men.
According to the study:
Factors about partners that are not
captured by the individual risk behavior focus of most studies. For instance,
some studies have found that black gay men tend to restrict sex to partners of
their own ethnicity and are also more likely to have sex with men a number of
years older or younger than themselves. Both of these would tend to concentrate
HIV infection within the black gay community.
Meanwhile, one factor that could
explain the pruding-up/settling down of MSM America could be the legalization of same-sex marriage. Massachusetts became the
first state to adopt gay marriage one year after the first set of data was
collected.
so statistically speaking, the chances of you doing me are nil at best.. bummer
ReplyDeletethere are exceptions to every rule sir.
DeleteWe have to make it our responsibility to change those statistics...it is incumbent upon us to become sluttier and really go out and paint the town red...we wouldn't want to disappoint all those prudish homophobes would we?...lol
ReplyDeletesaludos,
raulito
no we wouldn't :)
DeleteI am curious as to where this study was done. I have to say this made me feel a tiny bit sluttty:P
ReplyDeleteI wonder that myself, slutty is GOOD sir :)
DeleteDoh, perhaps I should try honing reading skills. I see now where it was done. I'm going to hunt down info on my country now and compare. Thanks.
Deletemake sure you post it on your blog
DeleteHmm, I don't know about this study, but it looks to me like there are still pretty much slutty guys...
ReplyDeleteyeah sluts will ALWAYS exist
Delete