THE
THROW-AND-CATCH-BALL GAME
Simply put,
queer baiting in TV and film is when they give you a close-up of Stiles and
Derek from Teen Wolf and you think they are about to finally kiss, but they
don’t. If we have to put it in a more refined way, queer baiting is when they
suggest queerness but don’t follow through. The character is made to behave in
a manner that is acting like a tranquilizing pill to both the queer audience
and the queerphobic one, but at some point, the character starts showing signs
of attraction towards another person of the same gender. And just when the
queer spectator is a step away from identifying with the character, the
scriptwriters pull out the bait by involving the character in a straight
relationship. Sorry, pal, your ice cream has just melted down to a sad pond of sweet
vanilla!
IT’S JUST A
BUSINESS TRICK
Queerbaiting
in advertising is not a day-old food. It’s been here since the early 1990s.
Remember the Subaru ad campaign from that era? The brand’s marketers did their
own research into the gay market, and were very much hoping to break through
with queer women by selling cars with coded license plates like “Xena LVR” and
“P-Town.” The art of queerbaiting in business has significantly evolved in the
last decade, and now, it’s just absolutely everywhere. You can’t see an ad for
a simple peanut without the rainbow colors on the background! If that’s not
fishing for approval AND profit, I don’t know what else is!
A huge percent
of the biggest US companies are bold enough to directly target LGBTQ consumers.
Nike’s groundbreaking marketing tactic was to tell the story of the first
openly trans athlete, Chris Moiser. Clean&Clear followed by making trans
youths the focus of their ads. We don’t doubt that most of these companies
sincerely embrace the idea of inclusiveness, but the primal reason behind such
marketing strategies is that they simply want the LGBTQ’s $4 trillion
purchasing power. That’s why we expect for more and more such ad campaigns in
the future.
CAUGHT IN THE
ACT
Not one and
two straight celebrities have been recently accused of queerbaiting and made
publicly apologize in the media. Female celebs face more often backlash for
their faux-pas, while guys, on the contrary, are applauded for embracing sexual
fluidity and implementing it in their looks and performances. One possible
reason why females are so mercilessly attacked for challenging sexual norms is
that the audience holds them on a higher pedestal, hence a higher standard. The
problem with these artists is not that they often depict queer relationships, but
that they don’t really go “all the way” with it. They fail in explicitly
expressing a queer identity and rarely show lasting support of the queer
community.
If you still
need a tip on how to navigate queerbaiting, here is the simplest rule: If they
are not gay and they are doing something gay as a marketing tactic, it’s most
probably queerbaiting. Sorry, Cavin Klein!
SOURCE: ANDREW CHRISTIAN
No comments:
Post a Comment