It was reviewing movies that made
Roger Ebert as famous and wealthy as many of the stars who felt the sting or
caress of his pen or were the recipients of his televised thumbs-up or
thumbs-down judgments. But in his words and in his life he displayed the soul
of a poet whose passions and interests extended far beyond the darkened
theaters where he spent so much of his professional life.
The Pulitzer Prize-winning movie
critic for the Chicago Sun-Times for more than 45 years and for more than three
decades the co-host of one of the most powerful programs in television history
(initially with the late Gene Siskel, the movie critic for the Chicago Tribune,
and, following Siskel’s death in 1999, with his Sun-Times colleague Richard
Roeper), Ebert died Thursday, according to a family friend.
He was 70 years old.
Even through his latest illness, he
kept writing and remained as active as he could be. He was planning to host the
15th annual Roger Ebert’s Film Festival later this month in his hometown of
Champaign-Urbana.
Tributes to Ebert came on Thursday from
the White House and Chicago City Hall.
President Barack Obama issued a
statement that "movies won't be the same without Roger." The
president stated, "Even amidst his own battles with cancer, Roger was as
productive as he was resilient -- continuing to share his passion and
perspective with the world."
Mayor Rahm Emanuel released a
statement praising Ebert for championing Chicago "as a center for
filmmaking and critiques ... The final reel of his life may have run through to
the end, but his memory will never fade."
"Even in recent years when
illness robbed him of his ability to speak, the mere act of raising his thumb
brought auditoriums full of people to their feet in applause," said a
statement from Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn.
Prolific almost to the point of
disbelief -- the Weekend section of the Sun-Times often featured as many as
nine reviews on some days -- Ebert was arguably the most powerful movie critic
in the history of that art form. He was also the author of 15 books, a
contributor to various magazines, author of the liveliest of blogs and an
inspiring teacher and lecturer at the University of Chicago.
Roger Joseph Ebert was born in
downstate Urbana on June 18, 1942, the only child of Walter, an electrician,
and Annabel, a bookkeeper.
His passion for journalism sparked
early. He published his own neighborhood paper while in grammar school and in
high school was co-editor of the school paper, published a science fiction
fanzine and wrote for The News-Gazette in Champaign. His desire to attend Harvard
University was thwarted by his parents' inability to afford that Ivy League
institution, he attended the nearby University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,
where he majored in journalism and was editor of the campus paper, The Daily
Illini.
He began selling freelance stories
and book reviews to the Chicago Daily News and Chicago Sun-Times during this
time and after coming to Chicago to pursue a PhD. in English at the University
of Chicago. In 1966, he was hired as a writer for the Sun-Times’ Midwest magazine.
Six months later he became movie critic.
His reviews, from the start and ever
since, were at once artful and accessible. In 1975 he was awarded the Pulitzer
Prize for criticism, the first such criticism prize to be awarded for film
criticism by the Pulitzers.
These were raucous newspapering days
(and nights) and Ebert was part of the crowd that often congregated at such
bygone saloons as Riccardo’s and O’Rourke’s on North Avenue. It was there that
Ebert would entertain the crowd of colleagues and admirers with his sharp wit,
boyish playfulness and charming erudition.
Competition between rival newspapers
reporters and critics was savage in those days as Siskel, then the Tribune’s
movie critic, later recalled, “We intensely disliked each other. We perceived
each other as a threat to our well-being.”
But in 1975, Eliot Wald, a producer
at the local PBS station, WTTW-Ch. 11, had the idea of pairing Siskel and Ebert
on a television show about movies and persuaded them both to give it a shot.
Thea Flaum was the executive producer of what was then called “Opening Soon at
a Theater Near You.”
The early shows now appear as crude
and unpolished as some of the shows on cable access. But at the time it was
refreshing. Here were two men who, in physical appearance and personality, were
unlike anything else on the tube.
These were not the typically neatly
coiffed and sun-brushed talking heads. And they were not prim and polite; they
argued.
Their enthusiasm for and knowledge of
movies was palpable, and by providing clips from current releases they were
giving viewers a consumer-friendly, witty, intelligent and entertaining
package.
Still, few could have predicted
either the eventual success of the show or the natural fit of the two
personalities; they were uncannily well-matched and early on showed the ability
to turn debate into an art.
The show became more popular with
each season, taking a new name, “Sneak Previews,” and gaining a national
audience when it was syndicated on PBS in 1978 and where it would become for a
time the most highly rated show in PBS history. In 1982, the pair signed with
Tribune Entertainment and renamed the program “At the Movies.” In 1986 they
were lured into the fold of Buena Vista Television, a division of the Walt
Disney Co., and changed the show’s name to “Siskel & Ebert at the Movies.”
By this time the TV show had made
Siskel and Ebert rich and famous. It had also made them the most powerful
critics in the world, according to many polls and industry experts, and
American pop cultural icons, sometimes referred to as “Sisbert.” They spawned
imitators and were firmly embedded in the American celebrity fabric due to
frequent appearances on the “Tonight” show, “Late Night With David Letterman”
and “Oprah.”
In 1999 Siskel died after a quiet
battle against complications that arose after a growth was removed from his
brain 10 months earlier. He was only 53 years old.
“I remember after we first started
out,” Ebert recalled at the time, “and we were on a talk show and this old
actor Buddy Rogers said to us, 'The trouble with you guys is that you have a
sibling rivalry.' We did. He was like a brother, and I loved him that way.”
Though their on-air chemistry was
deemed by the public more contentious than it actually was, Ebert recently
summarized the relationship thusly: “How meaningless was the hate, how deep was
the love.”
Ebert carried on with show, teaming
with Roeper for “At the Movies with Ebert & Roeper,” which began airing in
2000. Although his name remained in the title, Ebert did not appear on the show
after mid-2006, when he suffered post-surgical complications for his thyroid
cancer and was unable to speak. He ended his association with the show in July
2008. His last TV venture, “Ebert Presents: At the Movies,” ran for a short
time early in 2011, his reviews voiced by others, including Bill Kurtis and
this reporter.
He continued to write, devoting a
great deal of time to his popular blog (rogerebert.com), where he discussed
movies, among many topics, and detailed personal stories about his struggles
and joys, including his bout with booze, which ended in 1979 when he joined
Alcoholics Anonymous.
Many of those memories formed the
foundation for his easygoing, candid and altogether charming 2011
autobiography, or, as he titled it, “Life Itself: A Memoir.”
“I didn't intend for (my blog) to
drift into autobiography, but in blogging there is a tidal drift that pushes
you that way,” he wrote in the book. “Some of these words, since rewritten and
expanded, first appeared in blog form. Most are here for the first time. They
come pouring forth in a flood of relief.”
And so, he writes about his boyhood
dog Blackie and a great deal about Steak & Shake, the fast-food chain (“If
I were on death row, my last meal would be from Steak & Shake”). He vividly
reminds us that among his many writings was the screenplay for Russ Meyer's
1970 “Beyond the Valley of the Dolls” and the story for one of his later films.
An enthusiastic and self-proclaimed
aficionado of beautiful and accomplished women—he had a bit of a crush and a
friendship with Oprah Winfrey for a short time—Ebert married trial attorney
Charlie “Chaz” Hammel-Smith on July 18, 1993.
His affection for her and her
extended family peppers the book, and his love for her is palpable: “My life as
an independent adult began after I met Chaz.”
So is his gratitude for her
indefatigable devotion during his operations and rehabilitations, writing: “I
was very sick. ... This woman never lost her love, and when it was necessary
she forced me to want to live. ... Her love was like a wind pushing me from the
grave.”
The pair were terrific and energetic
hosts for parties at their homes in the Lincoln Park neighborhood and in
Harbert, Mich. Though Ebert’s health did not allow them to travel as they once
did, his memory could capture previous journeys. Here he is writing at his most
elegant in “Life Itself”: “Romance in the winter in Venice is intimate and
private, almost hushed. One night we went to the Municipal Casino, carefully
taking only as much money as we were ready to lose, and lost it. In a little
restaurant we had enough left for spaghetti with two plates and afterward
lacked even the fare for the canal bus. We walked the long way back through the
night and cold, our arms around each other, figures appearing out of the fog,
lights traced on the wet stones, pausing now and again to kiss and be solemn.”
Most of his books understandably
focus on film. But in “Life Itself” one gets to know and appreciate Ebert and
in it he tells us that the first movie he ever saw was “A Day at the Races.”
That may have helped set his course but there would have been no way to have
predicted how many of us—reading the newspapers or watching TV—would be along
for the colorful, influential and meaningful ride.
He is survived by his wife, Chaz.
Services are pending.
I took an instant disliking to him back when he was playing the heavy to Gene Siskel on their show "Sneak Previews". Should have given him a chance; he was quite an amazing guy. RIP
ReplyDeleteYeah can come off harsh sometimes.
Delete